Paper I:
--- catalog of distant objects, ROSAT detection, and survey area calibration
Paper II:
--- Chandra observations of complete samples at low and high z, discussion of cluster mass function derivation and systematics. A measurement of the evolving M-L relation
Paper III:
--- Cosmological constraints --- dark energy equation of state,
neutrino mass, and sigma8
Description of the 400d cluster list and statistical calibration
of the catalog. Cluster log N – log S and
evolving X-ray luminosity function. For description of the X-ray
detection algorithm, see Vikhlinin
et al. (1998).
Cluster mass estimates
Vikhlinin et al. 2006:
"Chandra Sample of Nearby Relaxed Galaxy Clusters: Mass, Gas Fraction, and Mass-Temperature Relation".
Hydrostatic total mass estimates in a sample of well-observed, low-z relaxed clusters. This work is a foundation of our calibration of scaling relations between total mass and X-ray observables.
Kotov & Vikhlinin 2006:
"Chandra Sample of Galaxy Clusters at z = 0.4-0.55: Evolution in the Mass-Temperature Relation".
This work uses mock Chandra data made from the output of cosmological simulations to test how accurately the cluster parameters are recovered in the X-ray analysis
Comparison of gas temperature, density, pressure, and entropy profiles and scalings in the simulated clusters and in the Chandra sample of V06. The main conclusion is that the X-ray properties of ART-simulated clusters match very well the observations except for the innermost regions.
Analysis of Chandra images of the high-redshift 400d clusters
shows a smaller fraction of objects with the peaked X-ray
surface brightness profiles compared to the low-redshift
population.